revlon mogul, ny art dealer file dueling lawsuits

september 13, 2012

 

The gloves are coming off in an epic art battle between billionaire Revlon mogul and art collector Ronald Perelman and New York's reigning art dealer Larry Gagosian. The two traded lawsuits against each other to the Manhattan Supreme Court within hours of each other, according to the Associated Press.

The art market heavyweights (and former buddies slash business partners) are leveling claims surrounding a number of art transactions gone south. A part of case revolves around a possible secret agreement between Gagosian and Jeff Koons, one of the wealthiest living contemporary artists.

Perelman describes Gagosian as "the most powerful dealer in the contemporary art world,” and "a constant and trusted art advisor and mentor," reports the New York Post. The billionaire investor's claim rests upon his dependence on Gagosian as well as the weight of Gagosian's word in the insular art world.

According to Perelman, Gagosian fraudulently undervalued Koons' "Popeye," claiming that it was worth $4 million, despite Perelman's belief that the piece was worth far more. Koons is currently in the process of making a $25 million sculpture for LACMA, so it's not as if Perelman's claims are totally off base. This was due to a secret deal between Gagosian and Koons, allotting Koons 70% above the original sale price if resold. "These secret contract provisions detrimentally affected Gagosian’s ability and willingness to repurchase or resell Popeye above the price paid by plaintiffs" as Perelman's suit claims.

Gagosian's lawsuit, filed shortly afterward, accuses Perelman of breaking contracts pertaining to two different works of art that delivered to his East Hampton home, a $12 million sculpture and a $10.5 million painting. Instead, Perelman offered $4.7 million cash for the sculpture and $250,000 for the painting, making up the difference by offering pieces from his own personal art collection (including "Popeye,") leaving Gagosian with $7.8 million of art he could not sell. Gagosian alleges Perelman also refused to return the works, although Perelman spokeswoman Christine Taylor told the Post there was proof that the works were "fully paid for." We followed up with Taylor via e-mail; she assured The Huffington Post she is in possession of checks paid in full for the contested pieces, and that these checks were cancelled by Mr. Gagosian. When we reached out to Gagosian Gallery for comment, they preferred not to respond at this time.

And thus, the claim against Perelman continues. The suit accuses him of engaging in "a series of sham settlements and deceptive maneuvers" following the non-payment.

Gagosian's suit claims he has never filed a lawsuit against a client in his 30 years of business. Yet the gallery owner has been involved in a number of lawsuits in the past few years, including a bizarre 2009 suit against a gold supplier after the gallery paid $3 million for real gold blocks for a Chris Burden exhibition and the supplier never delivered the gold art. Earlier this year, Gagosian was embroiled in a lawsuit when an art collector claimed he sold Roy Lichtenstein's "Girl in Mirror" (1964) from her collection without her consent.

Perelman is also no stranger to the justice system. His lengthy court battles have involved his former chief financial officer, a former vice chairman, and all four ex-wives, as well as his own brother and even his father.

The two cases are, for the most part, unrelated and could very well both be true. In an email to The Huffington Post, Taylor called Gagosian's suit "frivolous... a failed attempt to take the focus off the lawsuit we filed." Additionally Taylor's claim to possess signed checks would fully refute Gagosian's case. Yet is Perelman's florid tale of a former friend who betrayed him with bad advice grounds for a case? Just how much sway would Gagosian's valuation of "Popeye" hold in the market? These are questions we look forward to seeing addressed as the case continues.

In case you were wondering, Perelman is by no means down and out as a result of this deal. The collector is listed as 27th in the U.S. Bloomberg Billionaires Index, and is worth $12 billion.

Here's a slideshow of Koons' work, on view at Schirn Kunsthalle and Liebieghaus Skulpturensammlung Frankfurt in Germany until September 23, 2012

via: huff post arts